Post Office's solicitor does not admit to covering up evidence

A lawyer employed by the Post Office was alerted to issues with the Horizon system just before the trial of a pregnant sub-postmistress but failed to share this crucial information with the defense team, as the ongoing Post Office inquiry has revealed. In October 2010, an email from a member of the Post Office security team highlighted potential problems with Horizon, sent to in-house solicitor Jarnail Singh along with an attachment containing detailed findings from Fujitsu. Singh claimed he hadn’t seen the email or attachment and didn’t print the documents, citing a lack of familiarity with saving attachments at the time.

During the inquiry, counsel Jason Beer KC probed Singh’s knowledge of Horizon system bugs prior to 2013, suggesting the possibility of a cover-up. Singh vehemently denied any intention to deceive, emphasizing his commitment to assisting the inquiry. Additionally, the inquiry uncovered an email from in-house civil lawyer Mandy Talbot to Singh, wherein he promised to keep her updated on any significant Horizon-related developments during the trial.

Despite characterizing himself as merely a conduit within the organization, Singh was actively involved in discussions regarding prosecutions and agreements intended to silence sub-postmasters regarding Horizon issues. This suggests a more significant role in the management of information and decision-making processes than previously acknowledged. As the inquiry delves deeper, it’s becoming increasingly evident that Singh’s involvement may have far-reaching implications for the handling of Horizon system issues within the Post Office and the individuals affected by its shortcomings.

Source: Post Office solicitor Jarnail Singh tells public inquiry did not know about Horizon bugs in 2010 | Law Gazette

image

4 Likes

It’s really disheartening to hear about the lack of transparency surrounding the Horizon system issues, especially when it potentially impacted the trial of a pregnant sub-postmistress. I mean, everyone deserves a fair trial, and it’s concerning to think that crucial information may not have been properly shared with the defense team.

2 Likes

Wow, this is some serious stuff coming to light! Do you think this revelation will lead to further investigation into how widespread these issues were within the Post Office, and what consequences might it have for those affected?

3 Likes

It will possibly bring further investigations into the Post Office’s affairs and (hopefully) set a better precedent for future cases. Not sure about the consequences of those affected, but I am pretty sure it is illegal to cover up stuff tbh lmao

3 Likes

Given the lawyer’s role in managing information related to the Horizon system and its impact on sub-postmasters, do you think there should be additional safeguards or oversight mechanisms to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future within organizations like the Post Office?

2 Likes

Surely - employees should from now on be under close supervision to prevent things like this from happening again. The Post Office can take no further risks.

2 Likes

Fully agree!

2 Likes