Will AI change common law?

During a recent address to the Manchester Law Society, Sir Geoffrey Vos, the master of the rolls, shed light on the profound impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on common law principles. With a tone of cautious optimism, Sir Geoffrey explored how AI might revolutionize various legal realms, spanning from company and contract law to the intricacies of criminal proceedings.

Sir Geoffrey underscored the pragmatic benefits of integrating AI into legal practice, suggesting that lawyers may soon find themselves compelled to harness AI tools to uphold standards of competency. Envisioning a future where AI systems play a pivotal role in routine decision-making, he envisioned a symbiotic relationship between human judges and AI-generated outcomes, ensuring a balance of efficiency and ethical oversight.

Despite lingering apprehensions surrounding AI’s implementation, Sir Geoffrey sought to demystify the technology, likening it to ubiquitous tools like smartphones. He emphasized AI’s potential to streamline tasks such as contract drafting, albeit with a caveat for human intervention to ensure accuracy and ethical considerations. Looking ahead, Sir Geoffrey hinted at the possibility of AI prompting a reevaluation of foundational legal principles within the common law framework, while also offering opportunities to enhance the efficacy and accessibility of the digital justice system.

Source: Generative AI will change principles of common law as well as its practice, Sir Geoffrey Vos tells Manchester Law Society | Law Gazette

4 Likes

It’s fascinating to see how artificial intelligence is reshaping the legal landscape, especially with its potential to affect common law principles. I wonder how legal professionals are adapting to these changes and whether there are any concerns about the ethical implications of AI in the legal field?

2 Likes

i highly doubt it

2 Likes

There will always be concerns, especially about confidential client information and how it will be used by the AI. Using AI software created internally by a law firm may be alright, but using public software like ChatGPT is risky and the confidential information may remain stocked within the OpenAI servers.

2 Likes

An interesting perspective, have never considered it this way

1 Like