The UK government’s recent efforts to safeguard children from sexual abuse have been met with criticism, described as deeply disappointing by Alexis Jay, the chair of the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse. Survivors of abuse have gone further, labeling the measures as “worse than useless.” The proposed legislation, which includes a “duty to report” provision, falls short of expectations set by the seven-year independent inquiry.
According to Jay, survivors are upset and angry, echoing the sentiments of many who anticipated meaningful action in response to the inquiry’s recommendations. The legislation, outlined in an amendment to the criminal justice bill, has drawn outrage from campaigners and lawyers alike, who argue that it fails to meet the inquiry’s recommendations.
The heart of the dissatisfaction lies in the perceived inadequacy of the “duty to report” provision. Critics argue that the proposed law lacks teeth, offering only minor penalties for non-compliance. They highlight loopholes that could allow individuals in positions of authority to delay reporting abuse indefinitely, potentially endangering children further.
Furthermore, campaigners assert that the legislation’s focus on hard evidence overlooks the importance of reporting suspicions or indicators of abuse. Without clear sanctions for failure to report, they argue, the effectiveness of child safety measures remains in question. In essence, the government’s proposed measures fall short of addressing the urgent need for robust safeguards against child sexual abuse.
